Monthly Archives: May 2012

2012 Singles’ Retreat

by Joyce Kang

Discontentment. We have all experienced it to one degree or another. When life doesn’t go according to our plans we often justify our dissatisfaction by blaming our circumstances, other people, or perhaps even God. At our recent retreat, Pastor John Kim preached a series of sermons addressing the root of discontentment and the hope believers have in cultivating true joy in Christ.

The first message challenged me to consider the seriousness of a complaining attitude and how it is rooted in a deeper heart issue. Like cancer a discontented heart is destructive in nature, a sickness that spreads quickly through the whole of your spiritual life, while infecting others and robbing God of His glory. Proverbs 3:5-6 commands us to trust in the Lord with all our heart, lean not on our own understanding and acknowledge Him in all our ways. When we complain, we do the exact opposite and reveal a lack of trust and submission to God’s will for our lives. In our arrogance we claim to know better than Him, and by doing so our actions show that we despise our Creator and reject His leading in our lives.

In the following two sessions Pastor John exhorted us to hope in Christ and have the Gospel as the driving force in cultivating true joy. Jesus Christ has already met our greatest need on the cross. We were dead in our trespasses and sins, but God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, made us alive together with Christ (Ephesians 2:1, 4-5). Once deserving of nothing but eternal condemnation, Christ’s saving work on the cross granted us forgiveness of sins and adoption into His family. Ephesians 1:3 also tells us that we have been blessed with every spiritual blessing through Christ. He has given us all that we will ever need to be truly content in this lifetime and that truth should humble us daily. While it is impossible for a sinful heart to cultivate contentment on its own, with Christ as the object of our affections we can be freed from the enslavement of discontentment. Paul understood this incredible gift of grace and, as a result, learned the secret to rejoicing in every circumstance (Philippians 4:10). Like the Apostle Paul, true contentment must be nurtured and can only begin with a proper understanding of the Gospel.

The final session focused on discovering the secret of contentment in the midst of our suffering. As we examined Paul’s response to his hardship in 2 Corinthians 12:8-10, I was reminded of my need to trust in the unchanging character of God and rely on the sufficiency of His grace to sustain me in my times of weakness. My trials, as overwhelming as they may seem to me at times, are not arbitrarily given to me by a cold and distant God. Instead each hardship has been carefully orchestrated to expose the hidden sins of my heart, wean me from the false securities of this world, and draw me into sweeter fellowship with Christ.

Overall the messages helped me to realize that in the grand scheme of things, my circumstances are really not about me but are opportunities to bring glory to God and encouragement to others. God has entrusted each of us with unique trials to use for His kingdom purposes, so the next time we are tempted to grumble we ought to remember that there are greater things at stake than our own comfort. In fact every opportunity is a chance for us to make much of Christ and to make His glory known. The providence of God will always lead us to exactly where He desires us to be, and as a believer we have the security of knowing that He will work all things for His glory and our benefit (Romans 8:28). And as we continue to submit ourselves to the loving guidance of our Father, we will learn to walk through life with a joyful, steadfast spirit.

Israel Journal #7

by Pastor Patrick Cho

It is hard to believe that we have been in Israel for about a week now. It’s strange how in some ways it feels like time is flying by, and in some ways it feels like we have been here forever. This morning, we began the day at the Menachem Begin Center. We didn’t look around too much, but this was a helpful stop because the museum has examples of First Temple period tombs. This would have been the way well-to-do people were buried in the days of David and Solomon. These would be different than the Second Temple period kind of tomb that Jesus was buried in, but there are some similarities and it was still fascinating. There were a group of tombs that were discovered and (pretty carelessly) dug up that we could examine. Some of our team members even took turns lying where the deceased would have been laid. It made for some fun(?) pictures.

From the Menachem Begin Center, we took the bus to Bethlehem. It was interesting crossing over the Green Line into the Palestinian city. Of course in Bethlehem you can visit the Church of the Nativity, and that was the main reason why we went. The door to the church, called the Door of Humility, was designed very low so that you have to stoop to enter. Inside, the place looked like a typical Catholic Church with all its decorations and gilded furniture. I believe three different religious groups help run the church, so that explains why it seemed like there were three times as many decorations in the apse. We walked through the church quickly, but didn’t take the time to wait in line to visit the “navel of the earth.” There is a hole that you can put your hand in to touch the air in the recesses below the church where Jesus was supposedly born.

After the Church of the Nativity, we drove over to the Herodium, which is also very close to Bethlehem. This was a very impressive fortress/palace built by Herod the Great, and it is also the place where he was laid to rest. From afar, we could see that the Herodium was constructed on a hilltop. After the building was complete, Herod had servants bring up mounds of dirt to cover the outside walls so that as someone would approach, it would look like a normal hill. There is a giant swimming pool and race track at the base of the hill, and the palace itself was pretty amazing. As much as Herod was not liked during his time (and even to today), you have to admit that he was an ingenious designer/builder. Not only did he build these impressive palaces, of course he also rebuilt the Temple in Jerusalem.

We left Bethlehem and then headed over to Hebron to visit Ma’arat HaMachpela, or “The Tomb of the Cave.” This is the location where Abraham, Sarah, Jacob, and Leah are buried (Rachel is buried in northern Bethlehem). Because of historical tradition, we are pretty sure this is the actual location. It is an interesting place because it is a Jewish synagogue and Muslim mosque in one building. Because of the history of the politics, the Jews maintain the half of the building over which Abraham, Sarah, Jacob, and Leah are buried. The Muslims maintain the half of the building over which Isaac or Ishmael was buried (we don’t really know for sure who is on the Muslim side, though they claim it is Ishmael). We were not allowed into the Muslim side of the building so we only saw the Jewish side. There were four rooms dedicated to each of the patriarchs and matriarchs, and several Jews walked the corridors reading the Scriptures or Talmud as they passed by.

It was sad to see how people had thrown money or written prayers into the rooms. The Jews are a very superstitious people who believe that God’s blessing is greater at these kinds of holy sites. How awesome it is to consider that God is ever with us and that we don’t have to make pilgrimages to holy places to get any nearer to Him. He meets with us where we are and we can draw near to Him.

After Hebron, we headed back to the hotel and are going to enjoy a free day tomorrow. After the free day, we are going to pack up and leave for the Negev. I’m not sure what the internet situation is going to be, but I will try to update this journal as often as I can while we are down there. I really miss the my family and the church, and can’t wait to be back to share more stories and fill in some of the blanks that I have deliberately skipped in this journal for the sake of keeping the length short.

BOB – Isaiah

by Stephen Rodgers

ISAIAH IN 10 WORDS OR LESS

“A coming messiah will save people from their sins.”

TITLE

I’ll let you in on a little secret: this section is about to get really repetitious for the next few months.  ALL the prophetic books take their name from the prophet who…well…prophesied them. So there’s really no great mystery here.  However, there may be some good background material…

MSB:

The book derives its title from the author, whose name means “The LORD is salvation,” and is similar to the names Joshua, Elisha, and Jesus. Isaiah is quoted directly in the NT over 65 times, far more than any other OT prophet, and mentioned by name over 20 times.

Per Constable:

The title of this book of the Bible, as is true of the other prophetical books, comes from its writer. The book claims to have come from Isaiah (Isa 1:1; 2:1; 7:3; 13:1; 20:2; 37:2, 6, 21; 38:1, 4, 21; 39:3, 5, 8), and Jesus Christ and the apostles quoted him as being the writer at least 21 times, more often than they quoted all the other writing prophets combined. There are also many more quotations and allusions to Isaiah in the New Testament without reference to Isaiah being the writer. The only Old Testament book referred to more frequently than Isaiah in the New Testament is Psalms.

AUTHOR & AUDIENCE

I’m going to have to stake out some rather serious real estate either in this section or in the OBJECTIONS section below to deal with the issue of bipartite or tripartite authorship (over and against the traditional claim of a single author and a unified book). I’ll deal with that later and just use this section to give you a brief biography of Isaiah son of Amoz, sometimes referred to as the “prince of prophets.”

So let’s start with the summary out of the MSB:

Isaiah, the son of Amoz, ministered in and around Jerusalem as a prophet to Judah during the reigns of 4 kings of Judah: Uzziah (called “Azariah” in 2 Kings), Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah (Isa 1:1), from ca. 739–686 B.C. He evidently came from a family of some rank, because he had easy access to the king (Isa 7:3) and intimacy with a priest (Isa 8:2). He was married and had two sons who bore symbolic names: “Shear- jashub” (“a remnant shall return,” Isa 7:3) and “Maher-shalalhash-baz” (“hasting to the spoil, hurrying to the prey,” Isa 8:3). When called by God to prophesy, in the year of King Uzziah’s death (ca. 739 B.C.), he responded with a cheerful readiness, though he knew from the beginning that his ministry would be one of fruitless warning and exhortation (Isa 6:9–13). Having been reared in Jerusalem, he was an appropriate choice as a political and religious counselor to the nation.

Isaiah was a contemporary of Hosea and Micah. His writing style has no rival in its versatility of expression, brilliance of imagery, and richness of vocabulary. The early church father Jerome likened him to Demosthenes, the legendary Greek orator. His writing features a range of 2,186 different words, compared to 1,535 in Ezekiel, 1,653 in Jeremiah, and 2,170 in the Psalms. Second Chronicles 32:32 records that he wrote a biography of King Hezekiah also. The prophet lived until at least 681 B.C. when he penned the account of Sennacherib’s death (cf. Isa. 37:38). Tradition has it that he met his death under King Manasseh (ca. 695–642 B.C.) by being cut in two with a wooden saw (cf. Heb. 11:37).

The primary audience that Isaiah addressed were the people of Judah, who were failing to live according to the requirements of God’s law. (As previously mentioned, the “Covenant Lawsuit” is a recurring theme throughout all of the prophetic books). However, it should be understood that while his audience was Judah, his message actually encompassed Israel and the surrounding regions.

DATE

As mentioned in the excerpt from the MSB above, we actually have a very good idea of the time period during which Isaiah prophesied: roughly from 740 BC to 700 BC (which we know since he names the relevant reigning monarchs at the outset of the book in Isa 1:1). Additionally, while it’s not completely clear how active his ministry was beyond that, we know that he was still alive in 681 BC, since he recorded the death of Sennacharib (Isa. 37:38).

BACKGROUND & SETTING

There are some similarities between Judah during the ministry of Isaiah and the last several decades in the United States. Essentially there was a period of increasing economic and political prosperity that unfortunately was accompanied by moral decline as well. So on one hand, Judah was able to successfully resist the encroaching Assyrians (unlike the northern kingdom of Israel), even to the point that Babylonian envoys were seeking political and military alliances (2 Kings 20:12 ff). On the other hand, the spiritual state of Israel was in such decline that that was less difference (spiritually speaking) between Israel and the pagan world-powers with each passing day.

This was the context into which Isaiah stepped as a prophet of the LORD.

HISTORICAL & THEOLOGICAL THEMES

There are three major themes that run throughout Isaiah:

  • Judgment and Salvation. Often overlooked by critics, the entire book of Isaiah was written under the presupposition that Judah was doomed. God is the “Holy one of Israel” (Isa. 1:4) who must punish the rebellious (Isa. 1:2). But He tells Isaiah that He will yet have compassion on them (Isa. 14:1-2) and redeem them (Isa. 41:14, 43:3, 49:8).
  • God as King. Isaiah pictures God as the sovereign King, seated on a throne, and reigning not just over Israel, but over all of creation and history as well.
  • The Suffering Servant. Perhaps the most notable theme of Isaiah, this theme is featured in four “servant songs” (Isa. 42:1-9; 49:1-7; 50:4-9; 52:13-53:12) that describe the coming Messianic King. What makes this servant of God so notable is that He would bring justice and salvation not just for Israel (Isa. 42:1-17; 43:1-7, 14-21; 44:21-23) but for the Gentiles as well (Isa. 42:6; 55:4-5; 53:5-12; 61:1-2). When we get to the NT, we will see that this servant is identified as none other than Jesus Christ (Mt. 12:18-21; Lk. 4:20-21).

INTERPRETIVE CHALLENGES

In regards to interpretation, Isaiah is probably one of the more hotly contested books of the Bible, nevermind just the OT, or even the prophetic books. It’s definitely up there with Revelation and Song of Solomon, and depending on the theological controversies du jour, James and/or Genesis. You see, almost any position that wants to argue one way or the other regarding the state of future Israel is going to reach pretty deep into the book of Isaiah for their pet prooftexts. And just to be clear, I don’t mean to denigrate the various positions themselves, merely point out that they all use Isaiah in one way or another to justify their conclusions.

Generally however, the major issues have to do with whether the promises made by God through Isaiah regarding the future state of Israel are meant to be fulfilled literally (in which case they would apply to Israel) or figuratively (in which case they would apply to the church). And while the prophets often spoke in highly poetic language, if one expects to interpret the fulfillment of the earlier prophecies literally, then it would be reasonable to expect to interpret the later prophecies literally as well (barring some hermeneutical reason for expecting otherwise).

LITERARY FEATURES

Per the ESVSB:

The overall genre of the book is prophecy. Although biblical prophets primarily tell forth God’s message in their contemporary situation, and less frequently foretell the future, the last third of Isaiah is an exception in being mainly predictive of the future. It is important to clarify two literary features of the foretelling: first, having been received in visions, it has many figurative elements; and second, its purpose is not simply to tell the future but to express the author’s sense of Israel’s place in God’s overarching redemptive plan for the world.

OBJECTIONS

There really is only one major objection that the secular mind brings to bear on Isaiah, and it’s a considerable one: just how many Isaiah’s were there really? I’ll let Constable set the scene for you (emphasis mine):

There is no record of any serious scholar doubting the Isaianic authorship of the entire book before the twelfth century when Ibn Ezra, a Jewish commentator, did so. With the rise of rationalism, however, some German scholars took the lead in questioning it in the late eighteenth century. They claimed that the basis for their new view was the differences in style, content, and emphases in the various parts of the prophecy. Many scholars have noted that it is not really the text itself that argues for multiple authorship as much as the presence of predictive prophecy in chapters 40—66, which antisupernaturalistic critics try to explain away. Many modern rationalistic critics believe the purpose of prophetic literature is simply to call a particular people to faith in God, not to predict the future. However if the prophets did not predict the future, their theology is questionable. They frequently claimed that the fulfillment of their predictions would validate their theology, and it did. Six times in Isaiah God claimed the ability to predict the future (Isa. 42:8-9; 44:7-8; 45:1-4, 21; 46:10; 48:3-6).

I really do believe that cuts to the core of the issue. In case you didn’t follow that, let me summarize it for you:

  • Secular critics content that there were 2-3 different prophets who wrote what we now know as the book of Isaiah.
  • “Proto-Isaiah” wrote chapters 1-39 and lived during the time described in Isaiah 1:1.
  • “Deutero-Isaiah” wrote chapters 40-55 and lived sometime in the 6th century BC, in the time of the return of the Babylonians exiles.
  • “Tritero-Isaiah” wrote chapters 56-66 and lived sometime in the 5th century BC (although some scholars dispute this and lump him in with the second Isaiah).

I believe that the evidence strongly points to the author of Isaiah being Isaiah the son of Amoz alone. Arguments in support of this generally fall into three major categories: Biblical and historical attestation, thematic continuity, and the role of prophecy.  I’d like to quote the ESVSB on all three of these issues, and summarize each section with my own comments.

Biblical and Historical Attestation. There is unified testimony from the ancient world for single authorship. (1) The NT refers to passages throughout the book as the work of Isaiah (see Matt. 3:3; 4:14–16; 8:17; 12:17–21; 13:14–15; 15:7–9; Mark 7:6–7; Luke 3:4–6; 4:17–19; John 1:23; 12:37–41; Acts 8:27–35; 28:25–27; Rom. 9:27–29; 10:16, 20–21; 15:12). The NT acknowledges no other author or authors. The testimony of John in John 12:41 is especially instructive: “Isaiah said these things because he saw his glory and spoke of him.” “These things,” which is plural, refers to the two previous quotations in John 12:38 (using Isa. 53:1, from the so-called “Second Isaiah”) and John 12:40 (using Isa. 6:10, from so-called “First Isaiah”), but John refers to the one person, Isaiah, who both “saw his glory” and “spoke of him.” (2) The intertestamental book of Sirach (48:24–25) and the first-century Jewish historian Josephus (Jewish Antiquities 11.5–6) attest Isaiah’s authorship of the whole book. (3) A Hebrew manuscript of Isaiah in the Dead Sea Scrolls bears witness to the seamless unity of the book as the work of Isaiah. (4) It is hard to imagine how prophets could have issued such oracles as those of Isaiah 40–66, which were of such importance in the history of Judah, and yet fade into obscurity. (5) Later OT authors seem to cite prophecies from chapters 40–66, which they could not have done if the book were broken up as described (e.g., see note on 60:7, used in Ezra 7:27).

Short version: the apostles, Christ Himself, and our earliest historical records all indicate that the multiple-authorship theory was an utterly foreign idea.

Thematic Unity. There are many distinctive features of Isaiah’s style that run through all three parts. For example, Isaiah’s characteristic title for the Lord is “the Holy One of Israel,” which appears 25 times in the whole book (12 times in Isaiah 1–39; 11 times in chs. 40–55; and twice in chs. 56–66). It appears only six times outside of Isaiah: twice in Jeremiah, three times in the Psalms, and in 2 Kings 19:22 (cf. Isa. 37:33). The phrase “high and lifted up” is a feature of Isaiah, appearing in Isa. 2:12–14; 6:1; 52:13; 57:15 (i.e., in each of the three sections; see note on 6:1). The notes will show other aspects of coherent thought and expression in Isaiah. Any differences of style can be explained by the different topics of the chapters and by different stages in Isaiah’s life (e.g., Isaiah may have written chapters 40–66 after the Assyrian invasion of 701 b.c.).

Short version: if you’re going to argue against single-authorship, you need to account for the unlikely event that 2-3 different writers managed to be so consistent across a 300+ year period. Naturalism is a double-edged sword that cuts both ways; simply saying that a Biblical view of prophecy is unlikely is insufficient…you have to show that a competing explanation is significantly more plausible. In this case, the competing explanation actually flies in the face of the thematic and textual evidence.

The Role of Prophecy. The predictive material in chapters 40–66 is highly relevant both to the exilic audience and to Isaiah’s own day. Certainly it demonstrates the Lord’s rule over history; these chapters appeal to it for that purpose (e.g., Isa. 41:21–29), and Josephus (Jewish Antiquities 11.5–7) records a story of the impression the specific prediction of Cyrus (Isa. 44:28) made on the Persian monarch when he learned of it (a prediction made about 150 years in advance). The biblical worldview, which begins with the majestic Creator, can readily accept this. Further, chapters 40–66 often mention pagan religion, but specifically Babylonian material is rare (Isa. 46:1); most address Canaanite idolatry, which Judah mixed in with their worship of Yahweh (e.g., Isa. 57:5; 66:3, 17; cf. 40:19; 41:7, 29; 42:17; 45:16–20; 46:6; 48:5; and the extended satire on idolatry, 44:9–20)—and this was no longer a problem in Judah after the fall of Jerusalem.

Short version: even in an ANE context, Isaiah was understood to be prophecy. It’s also worth bearing in mind that predicting the future was NOT the primary work of the Biblical prophets (speaking the very words of God was), it was simply the means by which they were authenticated. Think of it like a police officer showing their badge to you. Their job is to enforce the law, not to show their badge. They simply show the badge in order to establish their identity, and therefore their right to enforce the law.

NOTABLE QUOTABLES

  • Isaiah 6:3
  • Isaiah 7:14
  • Isaiah 9:6
  • Isaiah 53:6

DID YOU KNOW?

  • Objections to the fact that Isaiah 40-55 clearly deal with the  post-exilic period overlook the fact that the names he gave his children points to that very fact as well…all the way back in chapter 7 (Isa. 7:3; 8:3).
  • Recent archaelogical discoveries confirm that paganism in Judah got so bad that some Israelites worshiped Asherah as the LORD’s consort (Isa. 17:8).
  • The Hebrew phrase for “a memorial and a name” (yad vashem) was many centuries later chosen as the name of the principle Holocaust monoment in Jerusalem in modern Israel (Isa. 56:5).

Other Works Referenced

  • Apologetics Study Bible, Isaiah”
  • Archaeological Study Bible, “Introduction to Isaiah”
  • ESV Study Bible, “Introduction to Isaiah” (PDF sam­ple from their RESOURCES page)
  • MacArthur Study Bible“Isaiah”
  • NET BibleIsaiah
  • NIV Study Bible, Isaiah
  • Reformation Study Bible, “Isaiah”
  • The Baker Illustrated Bible Handbook, “Isaiah”
  • Know Your Bible
  • Dever, The Message of the Old Testament
  • Driscoll, A Book You’ll Actually Read On the Old Testament
  • Knight, The Layman’s Bible Handbook

Israel Journal #6

by Pastor Patrick Cho

Today was another bus day, but the schedule was jam packed. We began by heading east over the Mount of Olives into the Judean wilderness on route to Jericho. This was a fascinating stop, and thankfully it wasn’t brutally hot out there. There is a major ridge route called the Ascent of Adummim that would have taken travelers roughly along the course of the Wadi Qilt from Jerusalem to Jericho. This route is the setting for Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37). It was really helpful to see how treacherous that journey would have been especially with all the caves and nooks in which robbers could have hidden. This wilderness was also the place where John the Baptist lived while eating locusts and honey (Matt. 3:1-4), and somewhere in the wilderness is probably where Jesus was led by the Spirit to be tempted (Matt. 4:1).

From the wilderness, we continued traveling northeast to Jericho. There are actually two Jerichos in existence today. The northern Jericho (also Tel es-Sultan) is the city that Joshua conquered in the Old Testament. The southern Jericho is from New Testament times, where Herod built Cypros, a fortress in honor of his mother. Walking around Tel es-Sultan was surreal. I couldn’t believe I was standing on the ground of Jericho! (And I couldn’t help but sing the VeggieTales song, “Keep Walking.”) I learned a few things from visiting the city. First, the city actually had two walls, an outer wall and an inner wall. They probably both came tumbling down when Joshua defeated the city. Rahab’s house would have been built into the outer wall. Second, the vast majority of the city surprisingly has not been excavated. It kind of made me want to get on my hands and knees and start digging! And third, the city of Jericho with its walls that reached to the heavens, was not a very big city. It would take about fifteen to twenty minutes to walk around its perimeter. But for where the city is located (off the beaten path) and for Bible times, I suppose it was a significant city.

From Jericho, we went west to the area of Geba and Michmash. This is the setting of the story when Jonathan defeated the Philistine garrison (1 Sam. 14:1-15). There is a significant canyon separating Geba and Michmash simply called “the pass” in Scripture. Geba is where the Israelites were camped, and Michmash is where the Philistines were camped. Jonathan and his armor bearer climbed down one side of this enormous and incredibly steep canyon and back up the other side before meeting the Philistines in battle. He quickly killed twenty men (after climbing that canyon on hand and foot), and the rest of the Philistines retreated. Needless to say, Jonathan is the man (and his armor bearer was pretty much manly, too). I was tired just climbing to the lookout from the bus!

After a couple more stops to see the Central Benjamin Plateau and learn about the significant biblical events that took place there, we ended our day in Gezer. A couple significant archaeological finds are worth noting from Gezer. First, at the city wall there is a six-chambered gate. This was a significant advancement because most cities only had four chambered gates. This is important because these six-chambered gates could be associated with Solomon. Several other cities that we know Solomon worked to rebuild also had these gates. Second, archaeologists discovered the Gezer calendar in this city. It looked to be a primer for school children about the harvest, but evinces one of the earliest forms of alphabetic writing.

While most of the locations we visited are not as well-known to believers as other major cities like Jerusalem and Bethlehem, the significance of the Central Benjamin Plateau can’t be missed. It provided a major crossroads both north/south and east/west and really was the front door to Jerusalem. It is no wonder we see so much happen in this area, particularly in the Old Testament. Possession of this area was strategic for controlling the land. It was a long day, but a fascinating day of learning.

Signs of Spiritual Maturity #2: The Prerequisite

by Elder Peter Lim

For the first real article in this series (as opposed to the introduction), I wanted to get us all on the same page with respect to the only real prerequisite for spiritual maturity by stating the obvious: one must be genuinely a Christian before one can truly recognize the signs of spiritual maturity. This point can’t be emphasized enough. Even if you’ve been going to church all your life, please examine yourself to see if you are truly a Christian. If you are feeling offended that your Christianity is being questioned, that’s one indication that you are not really one. Instead of taking offense, a true Christian would take it as an opportunity to reflect back on how sinful we are, and how God has rescued us out of our impending doom. We would be overwhelmed with gratitude, and any offense we would feel from a fellow sinner questioning our faith (or in any other situation) would pale in comparison to our offense before a holy God. This is why I would doubt the genuineness of salvation of anyone who is unwilling to forgive a fellow sinner. But that’s a topic of discussion for another day.

The first point of our examination is whether we recognize that each of us is a sinner. Sin is not merely “bad” things we do nor just mistakes that we make. It’s a condition of our heart that condemns all of us and renders us helpless to save ourselves. It’s easy to acknowledge that we made a mistake because after all, everyone makes mistakes. It’s not so easy to acknowledge that we have actually sinned against God because that’s who we are to the core. The actions that result from our condition (what most people call sin) give us a clue as to what we are truly like inside. Unfortunately, some who grow up going to church all their lives sometimes take the gospel for granted and never really come to a deep understanding of the depravity of their own sins. They do not feel excruciating remorse over their own sins but often dismiss their sins as something that just “happens” as it does to everyone else in the world. They give a tacit acknowledgement about the grace of God as if their mental acknowledgement is what saves them. Knowledge of our sinfulness in combination with an understanding of God’s holiness (sinlessness) helps us to understand that the penalty for sin (death) makes sense. So do you recognize your own sinfulness as something that is extremely offensive to God and not merely a bad thing that you’ve done?

The next point of our examination is to understand that this penalty for our sin has been paid by the only one who could’ve paid it for us. The death of Jesus Christ is the total fulfillment of God’s promise to us that “You will surely die” way back in Genesis. This promise can be fulfilled in people in one of two ways: by our death, or by the death of Jesus Christ. In either case, God’s wrath is satisfied. I’d rather accept the death of Christ for payment on my behalf rather than face judgement in my own death, wouldn’t you? It is this acceptance of Jesus’ substitutionary atonement which we call “conversion.” Now that we understand that the penalty of our sins was paid for, it naturally causes us to want to obey our loving God instead of sinning. The more we mature spiritually, the more we would want to please Him in all aspects of our lives instead of merely trying to avoid sin.

This last point of our examination, spiritual maturity, is the topic of study that I’d like to focus on for the next several months as I bring up several milestones in a Christian’s life. These markers will not come up in the same order for everyone. I hope and pray that you will recognize many if not all of these markers in your life. If you don’t, I hope you look forward to meeting them in your not-too-distant future. I have to warn you though, some of them won’t feel pleasant initially, at least in a humanly sense. There may even be some discouragements along the way and perhaps even some doubting as to whether you are truly saved in the first place. These are good struggles because they will result in clarity in growth or clarity in rejection of the gospel. Incredibly, the latter is a preferred state than someone who is self-deceived into thinking that he is saved. (Rev. 3:15) This is because then he clearly understands that it is his rejection of the gospel and denial of what Christ has done for him that will ultimately condemn, unlike those who are self-deceived, merely playing religious games. Friend, I don’t want you to be one of these. Please repent from your sins and let’s move forward toward the Light together while we encourage one another. Let’s all help, pursue peace, and love one another. A local assembly of us, committed to each other and to God is what we call church, and it’s a whole lot of fun.

Israel Journal #5

by Pastor Patrick Cho

Today was a bus day! Instead of walking everywhere we went, an air-conditioned bus picked us up in the morning and dropped us off at our location. It then picked us up and took us to our next destination. My legs were so grateful for this gift of grace! I appreciate so much more how much walking the people in Jesus’ day must have done. For example, Jerusalem and Bethany are on opposite sides of the Mount of Olives. Jesus probably stayed in Bethany during Passover, which means He walked over the Mount of Olives almost every night during the Passion Week! We took a bus.

So our first destination was the Mount of Olives. The bus took us to the top of the hill and we walked down. Walking downhill, we came first to the Jewish cemetery that pretty much covers the entire south side of the hill. Although this is not the exact cemetery that Jesus would have referred to in Matthew 23:27, it provided a great picture of what Jesus was saying. The Jews buy plots on the Mount of Olives facing the Temple Mount. The view from up there is absolutely breathtaking! Because of the view, it is prime real estate for dead people. A plot could easily cost a few hundred thousand dollars, and sometimes over a million! So, it’s not an average Joe’s burial ground. It is understood by some that they want to be buried there so that they can have front row seats when the Messiah comes to establish His kingdom. It’s so sad to consider that He did come already and that He won’t be coming to save them when He comes again.

The hill is literally covered with graves. On most of the graves, there are stones that people have piled on the grave markers to remember the deceased. An example of this is seen at the end of the movie “Schindler’s List,” when the Jews walk by and put stones on Oscar Schindler’s grave. Some of the graves have a lot of stones on them, which may indicate that the person there was very important, like Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, the inventor of Modern Hebrew, and Menahem Begin, former prime minister of Israel.

From the cemetery, we headed to the sanctuary of Dominus Flevit. This is a church deliberately designed to look like a tear drop or upside-down mourner’s cup. Back in Jesus’ day, professional mourners would collect their tears so that if real emotions could not be mustered up, they could artificially add some tears to their faces. The cups were also given to the survivors of the victims as mementos. Dominus Flevit is supposedly the location where Jesus mourned over Jerusalem. The location is possible, but there is no way to really know for sure. But it was helpful to see the view that Jesus would have had as He came up over the Mount of Olives from Bethany. When He saw the city out across the horizon, He wept for the lost people of the city (Luke 19:41-42).

Our next destination down the hill was the first of two possible sites for Gethsemane. The first was the Roman Catholic site, which was a very beautiful and lush garden filled with olive trees and various flowers. Of course, there was also a huge church there with a mass service. The place was really crowded with tourists. There were also vendors at the entrance trying to sell goods and souvenirs to the crowds walking by. The honking cars and buses also stole away from the serenity of the location.

The second possible location is probably more likely given the historical data, but both locations don’t have a ton of support. Really Jesus could have prayed anywhere, but the name Gethsemane means “a press of oil” and some oil presses were discovered in both areas. When the Crusaders first came to this second site, they believed it to be the likely spot. Through various circumstances, the Eastern Orthodox Church was able to secure the location. At least with this one, the Roman Catholics got the second choice. There isn’t a garden here but a grotto next to the giant Orthodox Church. We only took a brief look around because they were conducting mass at the grotto.

We then jumped back on the bus and headed to the Israel Museum. This was a bit of a disappointing stop because we did not know the museum was going to close for Sabbath as early as it did. By the time we got around to actually entering the museum, it was closed. Still, out in the center open air area of the museum, they have a giant model of Jerusalem as it would have looked in the days of Herod and Jesus. This was a very impressive sight! The model isn’t entirely biblical, but still very effective. It was also inspired by the Talmud and Josephus, so there are buildings there that are not mentioned in the Bible. It was helpful to give our group an overview of the topography of the city and the distances of locations in relation to each other. It was also helpful to see which walls and gates would have been around in Jesus’ day.

From there, we got back on the bus and headed to the city outside the Damascus Gate to visit Gordon’s Calvary. This was a beautiful and serene location, but very unlikely as the actual location for the crucifixion. Still, it served as a helpful picture of the events that took place around Jesus’ death and resurrection. It is funny though how growing up, this was the location that the churches I attended emphasized. It is from this location that Sunday School children are taught that the stone that was rolled away was over six feet in diameter and up to eighteen inches thick. In reality, the stone for Jesus’ tomb was probably more like four feet in diameter. Given all the historical details, an overwhelming case can be made that the Church of the Holy Sepulcher is the actual location. This was a bit disappointing because Gordon’s Calvary is a much prettier and serene location.

That pretty much concluded our day. We walked back to the hotel and had a chance to briefly do some shopping before having dinner. After dinner, we had class time together with the folks from Dallas Theological Seminary to prepare for tomorrow. We will be visiting the Central Benjamin Plateau, which was a very strategic area for the nation Israel because of its topography. I’m super excited because we will begin the day by heading out to Jericho via the eastern wilderness. I have been looking forward to that for months now.

Israel Journal #4

by Pastor Patrick Cho

Today was probably the most brutal day of walking so far during the trip. At times, I didn’t think I was going to make it! When we got back to the hotel, John and I took our showers and went straight to sleep. I was so exhausted, I didn’t even want to wash up. Only after considering how dirty we were from the day’s events, I thought it would be a good idea to get cleaned up. I’m sure John is thankful for that decision.

We began the day earlier than usual because we wanted to get over to the Temple Mount before it opened. Even though we got there fairly early, there was still a pretty long line. I don’t think anyone in the group cared because we were so excited to be there. The Temple Mount is where Solomon originally built the Temple. The Dome of the Rock, which is a decorative, non-functioning, Islamic mosque, sits on the likely spot where the Temple used to be.

Solomon built the Temple on Mt. Moriah, which is the location where Abraham was asked to offer up his son Isaac (Gen. 22:2). You would normally think that Abraham did this off in the far wilderness, but it would have been fairly close to the Canaanite settlement of Jebus. It was on Mt. Moriah where David built the altar at the threshing floor of Araunah (2 Sam. 24:11-25). And it was this city of Jebus that David eventually captured and renamed Jerusalem because it was never taken during the days of Joshua and the Judges of Israel (1 Chron. 11:1-9; 2 Sam. 5:6-12; cf. Josh. 15:63; Judg. 1:21; 19:10-12).

So, it was cool being on the Temple Mount considering all the historical significance of the place. I tried to imagine the Temple sitting there with its golden walls, beams, and doors. I imagined the priests walking through their daily routines of worship and sacrifice. It was amazing to consider that this was the place where the Shekinah (Heb. for “dwelling” or “resting”) Glory of the Lord rested on the Ark of the Covenant, and where He met with the people.

No Jews are allowed to go up to the Temple Mount, because they are not sure where the Holy of Holies used to be. They don’t want to accidentally step on holy ground and incur the wrath of God. The area is run by Jordanians today and is the site of three Islamic mosques. On Muslim holy days, apparently the entire area is covered with worshipping Muslims around the Al-Aqsa Mosque, the functioning mosque on the Mount.

From the Temple Mount, we headed to the Wohl Museum, which is an excavated area that is now a museum. It shows an area of homes that belonged to the aristocratic and wealthy inhabitants of Jerusalem during the days of Jesus. These would be fine homes even with some of today’s standards of fine living. Some of the buildings had Mosaic tiled floors and ornately decorated walls. It certainly was not the living place of common people. It was fascinating to see how many mikva’ot (or ceremonial cleansing pools) there were in the place. Dr. Grisanti explained that this was the kind of residence for the priests of the Temple who gained great wealth through their corrupt practices of selling animals for sacrifice in the Temple.

We went next to the Jerusalem Archaeological Park, which is wrapped around the Southern perimeter of the Temple Mount. It is here that you can see the foundation stones of Herod’s Temple and the devastating damage caused by the Romans in the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.). You can see where the Romans threw giant stones down to the street level below leaving the Temple in ruins. They quite literally did not leave one stone upon another, thus fulfilling Christ’s prophecy to His disciples (Matt. 24:1-2). Even the concrete below the wall is shattered in places where the giant stones fell.

From the Jerusalem Archaeological Park, we headed into the City of David area south of the Temple Mount and walked through Hezekiah’s tunnel (2 Chron. 32:30; 2 Kings 20:20). Hezekiah originally dug this tunnel in anticipation of an Assyrian attack on the city by Sennacherib. It not only channels water from the upper Gihon Spring to the Siloam Pool on the southernmost end of the city, but it also would have been served as a secret escape route in case of an attack. The tunnel was very cramped and the water at times came up to the thighs, but Dr. Grisanti said it was a must-do activity for our time in Jerusalem. There was also a water shaft inside the tunnel where Joab possibly snuck into Jebus to originally conquer the city for David (cf. 2 Sam. 5:8).

At the end of the tunnel, we ended up at the area of the Siloam Pool where Jesus healed the man who was born blind (John 9). This was a massive pool that is still mostly not excavated because most of it lies underneath a Greek Orthodox Church. Dr. Grisanti taught a lesson from John 9 and helped us to consider the importance of that healing in the ministry of Christ and sovereignty of God. When we were done at the tunnel, we looked forward to the long uphill climb back to the hotel. But instead of taking the main roads and pathways, we climbed up an ancient drainage route that leads straight up to the Temple Mount. It isn’t used as a drainage sewer anymore, but it is scary to think of all the things that would have travelled through there in Jesus’ time (i.e., water, blood, and whatever else from the Temple sacrifices).

The walks in the tunnels are what made the day so intense, besides the brisk pace that we have been trying to keep up throughout the hills of the city. Parts of the tunnels were low so that we needed to stoop in order to move forward. Needless to say, we were dirty, sweaty, and gross by the end of the day, so showers were necessary. But so was sleep.

He First Findeth His Own Brother Simon

by Charles Haddon Spurgeon

From John 1:41

This case is an excellent pattern of all cases where spiritual life is vigorous. As soon as a man has found Christ, he begins to find others. I will not believe that thou hast tasted of the honey of the gospel if thou canst eat it all thyself. True grace puts an end to all spiritual monopoly.

Andrew first found his own brother Simon, and then others. Relationship has a very strong demand upon our first individual efforts. Andrew, thou didst well to begin with Simon. I doubt whether there are not some Christians giving away tracts at other people’s houses who would do well to give away a tract at their own-whether there are not some engaged in works of usefulness abroad who are neglecting their special sphere of usefulness at home. Thou mayst or thou mayst not be called to evangelize the people in any particular locality, but certainly thou art called to see after thine own servants, thine own kinsfolk and acquaintance. Let thy religion begin at home. Many tradesmen export their best commodities-the Christian should not. He should have all his conversation everywhere of the best savour; but let him have a care to put forth the sweetest fruit of spiritual life and testimony in his own family.

When Andrew went to find his brother, he little imagined how eminent Simon would become. Simon Peter was worth ten Andrews so far as we can gather from sacred history, and yet Andrew was instrumental in bringing him to Jesus. You may be very deficient in talent yourself, and yet you may be the means of drawing to Christ one who shall become eminent in grace and service. Ah! dear friend, you little know the possibilities which are in you. You may but speak a word to a child, and in that child there may be slumbering a noble heart which shall stir the Christian church in years to come. Andrew has only two talents, but he finds Peter.

Go thou and do likewise.

2.19p

Israel Journal #3

by Pastor Patrick Cho

We have only been in Israel for two days, but it feels like we’ve been here for over a week. I’m so thankful for how Dr. Grisanti has thought through how to maximize our time while we are here. This of course means we walk a lot (I don’t think I’ve ever walked so much in my life!), but the exercise is actually starting to feel good. I may be able to come home in much better shape than when I left (physically and spiritually!).

We began the day with breakfast at the hotel and class at 7:30am. Along with the sightseeing, all that we have been learning has been a bit overwhelming. It really is like drinking out of the proverbial drinking fountain. We have been learning about Old Testament history, New Testament history, modern Israeli history, geography, manners and customs, etc. Class this morning was about getting a better grasp of the city in general. We reviewed its major hills, valleys, gates, water sources, and history. We ended our time of instruction learning some Hebrew songs.

A little after class, we walked along the perimeter of the city, on the city wall (called the Rampart Walk) travelling from the Jaffa Gate to the Zion Gate. Although these were not the original city walls, it was interesting to see the city from that vantage point. Looking down from the walls, it was clear to see how they gave defenders an advantage from sieges and attacks. It will be interesting to go to Jericho later on this trip to learn more about the wall there.

From the Rampart Walk, we headed out to the probable site of the Upper Room and Last Supper. Of course, the original room has been buried over time and a new building has been built in its place, but it was still really cool to know where the room was in relation to other parts of the city and to review what happened there. It was there that Jesus broke bread with His disciples and instituted communion (Luke 22:7ff). He also washed His disciples’ feet and instructed them to humbly serve one another (John 13). The Upper Room was also where Judas left to betray Christ after Jesus offered him bread (John 13:26-30).

From the Upper Room, we went to another high perch overlooking the city from the south. This was at the Roman Catholic Church of St. Peter in Gallicantu. This allegedly is the location of Caiaphas’ house. Historically, this would have been where Jesus was tried and Peter denied Christ three times before the rooster crowed twice. Gallicantu literally means “rooster crow” (the Spanish word for rooster is “gallo”), and we could actually hear some roosters in the distance. There really isn’t any archaeological evidence that this site is authentic, but it did offer an awesome view. From the vista, we could see the Temple Mount, the supposed site of the Potter’s Field, and pretty much the entire city south of the Temple. Of particular interest was when Dr. Grisanti walked us through Solomon’s coronation. It was fascinating to see geographically how Adonijah’s failed coup played out with Solomon’s coronation (1 Kings 1). While Adonijah prepared to declare himself king, he would have audibly heard the trumpets blow announcing Solomon’s reign.

After a quick lunch, we headed up the Via Dolorosa (or “The Way of Suffering”) to St. Anne’s Basilica. This is the site of the pool of Bethesda where Jesus healed the man who had been an invalid for thirty-eight years. The pools were surprisingly deep (almost 40 feet!) and you could see where the porticos (or patios) were. The local tradition of the area was that an angel would come and stir the waters and whoever was the first to climb in the pool would be miraculously healed. This man being an invalid was unable to enter the waters first, but Jesus miraculously healed him demonstrating His power, authority, and lovingkindness, but also authenticating His message as God’s Messiah. Of course, the Pharisees were more concerned that this man was carrying his bed on the Sabbath, and they overlooked the entire miracle and Miracle Worker.

From Bethesda, we had to quickly get over to the Museum of the First Temple. This place had artifacts and information about Solomon’s Temple and was absolutely fascinating. It also houses the oldest discovered facsimile of the Old Testament from Numbers 6. It was written on a thin sheet of silver and rolled up as an amulet! This is also the location of a pomegranate that was quite possibly used as a decoration on the priestly gown of Solomon’s Temple. On the pomegranate is engraved, “For the priest of the Temple of —-.” The blank is for the name YHWH. Since the Jews are careful about taking the Lord’s name in vain, you are expected to enter in the blank the word adonai (Lord), Jehovah, or ha shem (the Name).

After the museum, we went to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. There is heavy historical and archaeological evidence that this is the actual site of Jesus’ crucifixion and the empty tomb. The entire church was built in the days of Constantine by his mother Helena, destroyed in an invasion in the 600’s, and then rebuilt by the Crusaders. Inside it evoked mixed feelings in me. It was absolutely humbling and sobering to stand on the ground of the crucifixion and to see the site of the empty tomb. Just to consider historically what took place there was a worshipful experience that I will never forget. But the church is also a gaudy monstrosity of false worship. There are relics and decorations everywhere you see. Everything is covered in gold. But the saddest thing was to see the people there placing their faith in those relics and routines and trying to find God’s grace through them.

We actually didn’t go into the empty tomb because there is about an hour and a half wait just to see it for about a few seconds. But people do it! They wait in line just for the chance to touch the place where Jesus was laid. Dr. Grisanti was quick to remind us that Jesus was only in there for three days. We could certainly look forward more to when we will actually see Him on that last day.

There is a rock at the entrance of the church cut from Golgotha where people kiss the rock and rub their handkerchiefs on it as a way of taking some grace with them. It’s said that those handkerchiefs could aid in healing people or evoking blessing from God. It was just sad to see people weeping over this piece of rock and rubbing their handkerchiefs as if it is going to do some good. To see how greatly lost and misled these people were broke my heart.

At the end of the day, we headed back to the hotel for dinner before visiting a pedestrian district to see some modern shops. We ended up spending some time with team members at a McDonald’s. This was another very full and tiring day, but one that was also full of blessings. The devotionals that Dr. Grisanti has been sharing along the way have been truly encouraging and inspiring. Set against the backdrop of the city, the Word of God truly comes to life.

Weekly Links (5/18/2012)

The gospel starts with a promise: a relationship in the Spirit. It is pictured as a meal and a washing: the Lord’s Table and baptism. It is rooted in a unique action supplying a unique need: the cross. It is inaugurated as a gift that is the sign of the arrival of the new era: Pentecost. It is affirmed in divine action and Scripture: God working uniquely and inseparably through Jesus. It is embraced in a turn that ends in faith: invoking the name of Jesus. It involves a different kind of power and is designed to be a way of life: Reconciliation and the power of God unto salvation. (Darrel Bock, Recovering the Real Lost Gospel)

by Richard Shin

And here we are with another set of weekly links. Hope you enjoy these expressions of God’s grace!

  • Justin Taylor introduces the Report of the Creation Study Committee, published by the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA). It shares the different ways members of the PCA interpret Genesis 1-3. He gives a preview in his blog post, but you can read the full document here.
  • If you’ve been following the Weekly Links for a few months, you know that I shared about the passing of Denise, R.C. Sproul Jr.’s late wife. R.C. shares with us the sermon he almost preached at his wife’s memorial service.
  • For several weeks, Mike Riccardi has been sharing a series of posts on Learning to Suffer Well. I was going to wait for the series to come to a close before sharing it, but I didn’t want to rob you of the joy. You can find them here, here, and here, in chronological order of posting.
  • Paul Tautges shares a convicting post on laziness. Many, if not all, struggle with this sin. I hope this encouraging post enables you to act otherwise.
  • Jonathan Leeman from 9Marks shares the idea behind baptism’s being a requirement for church membership. That’s precisely what we teach here at Lighthouse Bible Church.
  • Nathan Bingham shares an excerpt from Steven Lawson’s The Gospel Focus of Charles Spurgeon on how Calvinism ought to evoke a passion for evangelism.
  • Ray Ortlund has a monster post on why right now counts forever. Indeed, it does.

Have a great weekend everyone.

Coram Deo